Master the FIFA Agent Disciplinary Code Exam with our comprehensive study guide. Test your knowledge with practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations for each answer. Prepare effectively and boost your confidence to ace the exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the composition of FIFA's judicial bodies?

  1. Only elected members from each club

  2. Chairpersons, deputies, and members elected by Congress

  3. Disciplinary and Appeal Committees formed by volunteers

  4. Club representatives and coaching staff

The correct answer is: Chairpersons, deputies, and members elected by Congress

The composition of FIFA's judicial bodies is defined by the governance structure established within the organization. The correct answer highlights that FIFA's judicial bodies, which include the Disciplinary Committee and the Appeal Committee, are composed of chairpersons, deputies, and members who are elected by Congress. This process ensures that those in positions of authority within FIFA's judicial framework are chosen democratically and represent various constituencies within the sport. This structure is important for maintaining the integrity and accountability of FIFA's judicial functions. By electing members, FIFA can ensure a layer of impartiality and expertise, as those chosen are often experienced individuals who understand the rules and regulations of the game. The other options do not accurately reflect the composition of FIFA's judicial bodies. For instance, suggesting that only elected members from each club (the first option) would create a body that lacks broader representation and might lead to conflicts of interest. The option mentioning volunteers (the third option) fails to recognize the formal election process that is key to maintaining the legitimacy of these roles. Finally, involving club representatives and coaching staff (the fourth option) does not align with the goal of having a neutral and expert judicial body, which is vital for fair adjudication in disciplinary matters.