In urgent cases, who has the authority to make decisions in FIFA disciplinary procedures?

In urgent cases, the chairperson of the Disciplinary Committee holds the authority to make decisions in FIFA disciplinary procedures. This provision is in place to ensure that matters requiring immediate attention can be resolved promptly without waiting for the entire committee to convene. The chairperson’s role is critical as they are entrusted with the responsibility to act swiftly and decisively in the interest of efficient governance and maintaining the integrity of the sport.

The committee as a whole would typically make decisions in regular circumstances, while the secretary general plays an administrative role and does not directly adjudicate disciplinary matters. The appeals committee primarily reviews decisions made by the disciplinary committee rather than making immediate decisions in urgent situations. Hence, having the chairperson act in these urgent matters streamlines the process and allows for a more responsive governance structure.